Happy Easter!

What could be a better subject for a food photographer. Couldn't resist getting a couple shots of our annual tradition of coloring eggs for Easter. I can't really think of a food with more color. Well, maybe some veggies like tomato's but in terms of variety this is tough to beat. It is all very inspiring, I am thinking I might make an interesting image for my food portfolio.

Easter Eggs Jackson Food Photography Delaware

All of the bright colors just beg to be photographed and perhaps with a bit of creative photo cropping we will get something beautiful. All of the photographic food styling was done by my two child assistants. They insisted to be paid in candy, I let them know I don't have a special inside track with the easter bunny but it seemed to work out well for them. Over the next few days we planned to sample our colorful culinary creations but we were too sick from all of the candy. Lighting was a breeze, I like to light from down set with a nice soft light, you can find all of my food photography lighting secrets here.

Easter Eggs Jackson Food Photography Delaware overhead

If you have any questions or comments I would be glad to hear you out. If you are a chef or a restaurant or have a product that you need great food photography for, I would be glad to provide a quote. I am happy to hear about your project and it doesn't cost a thing to ask.

Happy Holidays!!!! Welcome 2016

I couldn't resist getting a shot of the famous Smith house here in Delaware. A single photo doesn't do it justice though, it really goes on and on. It has become a family tradition to visit the house before Santa comes but tonight I made a special trip back to take its picture. In order to get the shot nice and sharp without lens flare and bright spots. I set up a sturdy tripod with a geared head and made multiple exposures, it is a technique I use often as an architectural photographer. If the camera stays absolutely still I can use bits and pieces from different exposures. I can even remove people.

Smith_Christmas_house_Jackson_Photographer.jpg

or on occasion add them, by picking all of the best people shots from several exposures I can make sure everyone is in just the right spot, and not blocking anything important. I shot this just for fun which can be a good way to challenge yourself, speaking of fun I recently started a series of weird portraits that I am really excited about. Thanks for checking this out. Please let me know if you have any questions. And as always, if you have a project or business that you need architectural photography for, I would love to hear about it.

Lightroom vs. Photomatix vs. Lighting

Sometimes it can be hard to tell exactly what an interior design photographer does, without knowing what to look for it can even be hard to recognize a highly skilled architectural photographer. The photos look great but it seems like all they do is shoot the natural light. I look at tons of interior photography in books and shelter magazines and often the photographers are so good at hiding their efforts, that I wonder if they light at all. So I have decided to try using only natural light and compare the results to my usual technique of combining several exposures. For natural light I tried two different techniques. The first technique used a single exposure, exposed a little dark to catch the highlights outside of the window. Then in Lightroom I dodged the image to remove a bit of exposure to bring up the light in the room and match it with the window. I raised the shadows and reduced the highlights to bring the dynamic range under control. The second technique was to bracket, shooting several exposures from light to dark and then combining the pictures in an HDR program called Photomatix. In Photomatix I used the exposure fusion which tends to give more realistic results and is sort of a milder form of HDR. Exposure fusion is convenient and often preferred by real estate photographers who need to be quick and run-and-gun.

I was surprised at how well the single image in Lightroom turned out. It is a bit flat.

I was surprised at how well the single image in Lightroom turned out. It is a bit flat.

This image is the exposure fusion version and the results are very similar to the single lightroom exposure. Both images were difficult to color balance. Both image are also painfully flat.

This image is the exposure fusion version and the results are very similar to the single lightroom exposure. Both images were difficult to color balance. Both image are also painfully flat.

For this shot I bounced strobe light around the window to give a sense that the light in the room was coming from the window. Using layer masks I combined the lit images with the natural light to give dimension without feeling too "lit".  …

For this shot I bounced strobe light around the window to give a sense that the light in the room was coming from the window. Using layer masks I combined the lit images with the natural light to give dimension without feeling too "lit".  Just as I thought, I do prefer the lit version, it seems to have more volume. Probably the best place to see the difference is to look at the bed reflected in the mirror. In the lit version the bed looks great all of the textures show well and the shadows on the wall are softer and more pleasing. I also think that the contrast on the chair back gives a truer sense of the object and feels more three dimensional.

Overall it was a fun project, it was shot for the artist that hand finished and refurbished the vanity. I think that this does prove for me that lighting can make all the difference, just as long as it doesn't look "lit".

In the end, lighting did make quite an impact on the final image. While the exposure fusion and single shot are usable I definitely prefer the lit version. In all cases the three versions require some good architectural photography photoshop techniques. More importantly, knowing how and when to light helps me insure that I never have to make a sub-par photo. I can always figure out some way to get the shot even if weather and lighting conspire to ruin the whole day. It is what you should be looking for if you are in the market for a photographer. Sometimes good-enough is good-enough but when it really matters that you get the best shot you really need a professional architectural photographer.

Meet Daniel Jackson.... Big Time Architectural Photographer

A little while back I was asked for images to be featured in the homepage slideshow of the Association of Independent Architectural Photographers. So I sent a few of my finest pictures. A couple of weeks later I went to their site and viola, I feel like a regular Julius Schulman. It is kind of fun to have my work represent the AIAP like this. The AIAP is a really good resource for architects looking to find architectural photographers near them. There are links by state with contact information and it is an easy place to see several portfolios at the same time.

What the Heck is that? Super close-up.

Lately I have been having a lot of fun with my Canon ef 100 2.8 macro lens, I also used a 25 extension tube and a 1.4 extender to get really close to my subject. With a 50mp camera like the 5ds I will be able to crop in really tight for even closer images. At this point I am so close, that it is tough to guess exactly what you are looking at. so here goes, any guesses? It kind of looks like a terry cloth towel or a cool looking textile almost like a sequined dress. Up close it has a texture a bit like scale armor that uses overlapping scales for protection.

Beach towel? Prom Dress? Terri cloth underpants in the aftermath of a tornado in British Colombia?

This is a tough one, it is not a towel. If i pull back out a bit it starts to make a little more sense. Still confusing though, almost like a horse, the colors seem very familiar. There is hair, so it is obviously organic, an animal of some kind.

Mr Ed quietly reading the newspaper as the sounds of children playing dances on the morning air like honeysuckles? A Kite? Bermuda shorts?

Now I am practically giving it away. Patterns of color to provide camouflage from birds and other predators.

Zebra upholstery? A  limited edition ukulele bag signed by the members of Grand Funk Railroad?

If you can't tell yet it is a monarch butterfly wing. 

Getting so up-close and personal can be really difficult. Once the camera is so zoomed in movement is exaggerated, little movements travel up the tripod leg and look like an earthquake. All of this wiggling can lead to blurry photos. A couple of tricks I have learned to keep things sharp are to use a tiny tripod on a solid surface like a cement basement floor. That way the subject and camera are locked together. Using a flash to light can minimize movement too, since the exposure is so short. It can be difficult to get enough light even with a flash because the extension tubes have the effect of lowering the light levels since less light gets to the camera sensor.

These photos have very little depth but that is another item to consider in macro photography. Usually for this kind of image it is smart to shoot multiple images with minute focus changes between each shot, then later the photos can be combined digitally to produce a single image that is sharp all over.

This kind of photography can seem light years away form the architectural photography that I do but in many ways both disciplines are quite similar. They both require pushing the technology to the absolute limit to get the highest image fidelity. They often require uncommon equipment and know how and attention to detail. I also think both are a lot of fun.

Have you got anything you would like to see magnified many times? Let me know what you would like to see and I will take a shot at making a macro of it.